THORNTON v. UL ENTERPRISES, LLC et al

THORNTON v. UL ENTERPRISES, LLC et al

Plaintiff:	LANCE THORNTON
Defendant:	UL ENTERPRISES, LLC, STNA, INC., STEVE LARSON, CHUAN-CHIH CHANG and CHIH-MING YANG
Case Number:	1:2009cv00287
Filed:	November 16, 2009
Court:	US District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania
Office:	Erie Office
County:	Erie
Presiding Judge:	Maurice B. Cohill
Nature of Suit:	Plaintiff
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Jury Demanded By:	Plaintiff

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
March 2, 2011	Filing 102 OPINION re 91 MOTION for Protective Order filed by LANCE THORNTON. Signed by Judge Maurice B. Cohill on 3/2/2011. (sjs)
November 15, 2010	Filing 86 OPINION AND ORDER DENYING 81 First MOTION to Compel Discovery filed by LANCE THORNTON, DENYING 85 MOTION for Hearing re 81 First MOTION to Compel Discovery filed by LANCE THORNTON. Signed by Judge Maurice B. Cohill on 11/15/2010. (sjs)
March 16, 2010	Filing 52 MEMORANDUM ORDER that Plaintiff's 35 MOTION to Strike 30 Defendant Steve Larson's Amended Counterclaim is DENIED without prejudice for Plaintiff to renew his challenges to Defendant Larson's defamation counterclaim once discovery is complete and the record more fully developed. Signed by Judge Maurice B. Cohill on 3/16/2010. (sjs)
February 4, 2010	Filing 28 OPINION re 20 MOTION to Dismiss re 14 Answer to Amended Complaint, Counterclaim, MOTION to Strike filed by LANCE THORNTON. Signed by Judge Maurice B. Cohill on 2/4/2010. (sjs)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Pennsylvania Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: THORNTON v. UL ENTERPRISES, LLC et al
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: LANCE THORNTON
Represented By:	David L. Hotchkiss
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: UL ENTERPRISES, LLC
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: STNA, INC.
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: STEVE LARSON
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: CHUAN-CHIH CHANG
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: CHIH-MING YANG
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?