RICHARDSON v. AUMENT et al
Plaintiff: TERRENCE RICHARDSON
Defendant: RYAN P. AUMENT
Case Number: 1:2010cv00162
Filed: July 6, 2010
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania
Office: Erie Office
County: Forest
Presiding Judge: Susan Paradise Baxter
Nature of Suit: Prison Condition
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
September 15, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 37 MEMORANDUM AND OPINION re 18 MOTION to Dismiss re 5 Complaint MOTION to Transfer Venue Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(3) filed by RYAN P. AUMENT. Signed by Magistrate Judge Maureen P. Kelly on 09/15/2011. A copy of the Opinion is being mailed contemporaneously with entry to Plaintiff at his address of record. (ndf)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Pennsylvania Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: RICHARDSON v. AUMENT et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: TERRENCE RICHARDSON
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: RYAN P. AUMENT
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?