HARVEY v. HOLDER
Plaintiff: ZIMMERY HARVEY
Defendant: ERIC H. HOLDER, JR.
Case Number: 1:2010cv00268
Filed: November 9, 2010
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania
Office: Erie Office
County: XX US, Outside State
Presiding Judge: Maurice B. Cohill
Nature of Suit: Employment
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
August 15, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 25 OPINION and ORDER granting in part and denying in part 19 MOTION to Dismiss Complaint filed by ERIC H. HOLDER, JR. Plaintiff shall file an Amended Complaint in accordance with this Opinion no later than 8/29/2011. Signed by Judge Maurice B. Cohill on 8/15/2011. (sjs)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Pennsylvania Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: HARVEY v. HOLDER
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: ZIMMERY HARVEY
Represented By: JEREMY CERUTTI
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: ERIC H. HOLDER, JR.
Represented By: THOMAS F. JOHNSON
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?