WINKELMAN v. LONGLEY
GEORGE WINKELMAN |
ARCHIE B. LONGLEY |
1:2010cv00302 |
December 22, 2010 |
US District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania |
Erie Office |
McKean |
Susan Paradise Baxter |
General |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 15 MEMORANDUM AND OPINION re 4 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by GEORGE WINKELMAN is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction over the Section 2241 petition or, in the alternative, for abuse of the writ of habeas corpus. Signed by Magistrate Judge Maureen P. Kelly on 11/8/2011. (tmr) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: WINKELMAN v. LONGLEY | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Petitioner: GEORGE WINKELMAN | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Respondent: ARCHIE B. LONGLEY | |
Represented By: | Jennifer Andrade |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.