OLLIE v. PUGH, ET AL

Respondent: MICHAEL PUGH, ET AL
Petitioner: JOSEPH OLLIE
Case Number: 1:2013cv00083
Filed: March 22, 2013
Court: Pennsylvania Western District Court
Office: Erie Office
County: XX US, Outside State
Presiding Judge: Susan Paradise Baxter
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28:2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
July 15, 2013 3 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER adopting Report and Recommendation re 2 Report and Recommendation as Opinion of the Court. Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is summarily dismissed and case shall be marked closed. Signed by Judge Maurice B. Cohill on 7/15/13. (bfm )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Pennsylvania Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: OLLIE v. PUGH, ET AL
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: MICHAEL PUGH, ET AL
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: JOSEPH OLLIE
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets were retrieved from PACER, and should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.