RIVERA-CRUZ v. MEEKS

Petitioner: RAMON RIVERA-CRUZ
Respondent: BOBBY L. MEEKS
Case Number: 1:2013cv00135
Filed: May 16, 2013
Court: Pennsylvania Western District Court
Office: Erie Office
County: McKean
Presiding Judge: Susan Paradise Baxter
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28:2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
November 18, 2013 10 Opinion or Order of the Court MEMORANDUM ORDER indicating that the petition for a writ of habeas corpus is summarily dismissed. The Report and Recommendation 8 of Magistrate Judge Baxter, filed on 9/24/13, is adopted as the opinion of the Court. The Clerk is directed to mark the case closed. Signed by Judge Nora Barry Fischer on 11/18/13. (jg)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Pennsylvania Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: RIVERA-CRUZ v. MEEKS
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: RAMON RIVERA-CRUZ
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: BOBBY L. MEEKS
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.