CHINA MAX INC. et al v. SOUTH HILLS CN LLC et al
CHINA MAX INC. and DE DONG ZHENG |
SOUTH HILLS CN LLC, ROSS PARK CC LLC, JING ZHU, DAVID WU and MAGIC WOK MALL LLC |
1:2014cv00211 |
August 11, 2014 |
US District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania |
Erie Office |
Erie |
J. Frederick Motz |
Other Fraud |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 34 ORDER re 30 Order to Show Cause. For the reasons stated more fully in the Memorandum filed contemporaneously herewith, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendants Ross Park CN LLC and South Hills CN LLC are DISMISSED from the instant case for failure to properly serve. Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(m). This dismissal is without prejudice to the later joinder of Defendants Ross Park and South Hills should discovery demonstrate a qualifying relationship between these entities and the properly served Defendants. Signed by Judge Cathy Bissoon on 7/8/2015. (rld) |
Filing 27 ORDER. For the reasons stated in the Memorandum Order filed herewith, Defendants' Motion to Dismiss and Motion to Strike (Doc. 16 ) is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART. Defendants' Motion to Dismiss Counts II-IX as time-barred is DENIED . Defendants' Motion to Strike Plaintiffs' prayer for attorneys' fees and punitive damages at Counts IV, VI, and IX construed as a Motion to Dismiss the same is GRANTED with prejudice. IT IS SO ORDERED. Signed by Judge Cathy Bissoon on 5/27/15. (rld) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.