LAWSON v. FERDARKO
Plaintiff: TYREE LAWSON
Defendant: JAMES FERDARKO
Case Number: 1:2015cv00177
Filed: July 20, 2015
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania
Office: Erie Office
County: Forest
Presiding Judge: Susan Paradise Baxter
Nature of Suit: Prison Condition
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
April 10, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 39 MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER that Plaintiffs motion to amend judgment 38 is denied. Signed by Magistrate Judge Susan Paradise Baxter on 4/10/17. (lrw)
January 4, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 36 MEMORANDUM OPINION that the Defendants Motion for Summary Judgment 24 will be GRANTED. An appropriate Order will issue separately. Signed by Magistrate Judge Susan Paradise Baxter on 1/4/17. (lrw)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Pennsylvania Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: LAWSON v. FERDARKO
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: TYREE LAWSON
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: JAMES FERDARKO
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?