BUTCHER v. DRAVO CORPORATION

 
Case Number: 2:2001cv01505
Filed: August 8, 2001
 
Court: Pennsylvania Western District Court
Office: Pittsburgh Office
Presiding Judge: Arthur J. Schwab
 
Nature of Suit: Marine Product Liability
Cause of Action: 28:1333 Admiralty
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download.
Date Filed#Document Text
March 25, 2009 123 Featured Case OPINION AND ORDER granting in part and denying in part 70 Motion for Summary Judgment filed by Price Inland; denying 74 Motion for Summary Judgment filed by American Commercial Lines, LLC and American Commercial Barge Lines; denying 81 Counter- Motion for Summary Judgment filed by Dravo Corp. and Dravo Lime Corp.; granting in part and denying in part 96 Counter-Motion for Summary Judgment filed by Dravo Corp. and Dravo Lime Corp. It is hereby Ordered that Price Inlands Motion for Summary Judgment 70 is GRANTED in its favor and against American Commercial Lines, LLC, American Commercial Barge Lines, and Butcher, and DENIED as to Dravo Corporation and Dravo Lime Corporation. Judgment is entered in favor of Price and against Butcher on his negligence claim in Civil Action 01-1505. Judgment is entered in favor of Price and against American Commercial Lines, LLC and American Commercial Barge Lines on the latter parties claim for contractual indemnity in Civil Action No. 01-1357. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the counter-motion for summary judgment filed by Dravo Corporation and Dravo Lime Corporation 81 against Price Inland on the Dravo parties claim for contribution and/or indemnity is DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Motion for Summary Judgment filed by American Commercial Lines, LLC and American Commercial Barge Lines 74 is DENIED with regard to the negligence claims of Butcher and Dravo Corp., and is DENIED with regard to ACBLs contractual indemnity claims a gainst Price and Dravo Lime. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the counter-motion for summary judgment filed by Dravo Corporation and Dravo Lime Corporation 96 is DENIED as to Dravo Limes claim that ACBL breached its agreement to provide suitable barges for transporting Dravo Limes lime under the Contract of Affreightment, and GRANTED as to ACBLs contractual indemnity claim against Dravo Lime under the Transportation Agreement. Judgment is entered in favor of American Commercial Lines, LLC and Amer ican Commercial Barge Lines and against Dravo Lime on Dravo Limes cross-claim in Civil Action No. 01-1505 for breach of contract. Judgment is entered in favor of Dravo Lime and against American Commercial Lines LLC and American Commercial Barge Lines on American Commercial Barge Lines contractual indemnity claim against Dravo Lime in Civil Action No. 02-1157. Signed by Magistrate Judge Lisa Pupo Lenihan on 3/25/09. (clh)
October 23, 2009 152 Featured Case MEMORANDUM AND OPINION re 143 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by PRICE INLAND TERMINAL COMPANY. Court will deny Price Inland's 143 Motion for Summary Judgment as to the Dravo parties' contractual indemnity claims against it in Civil Action No. 02-1157. A separate order follows. Signed by Magistrate Judge Lisa Pupo Lenihan on 10/23/09. (clh) Modified on 10/26/2009. (jsp)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Search for this case: BUTCHER v. DRAVO CORPORATION
Search Blogs [ Justia BlawgSearch | Google Blogsearch ]
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]