GLENN v. WYNDER et al
| 2:2006cv00513 |
| April 19, 2006 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania |
| Pittsburgh Office |
| Lisa Pupo Lenihan |
| Lisa Pupo Lenihan |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
104
ORDER issuing a Certificate of Appealability with respect to Claim 1 and Claim 6 of the Amended Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus. Signed by Magistrate Judge Lisa Pupo Lenihan on October 22, 2012.(kcc)
|
|
Filing
100
ORDER denying 52 Amended Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus and Certificate of Appealability. Signed by Magistrate Judge Lisa Pupo Lenihan on September 19, 2012. (kcc)
|
|
Filing
97
Respondents are hereby ORDERED to submit a Supplemental Answer, within thirty (30) days of the date of this Order, specifically addressing the applicability of Martinez v. Ryan, 132 S. Ct. 1309 (2012) to Claims 2(B), 6(F), 8(H), and 9(I) in the amended petiiton (ECF No. 52). Petitioner shall file a Reply to the Supplemental Answer within fourteen (14) days from the date the Supplemental Answer is filed. Signed by Magistrate Judge Lisa Pupo Lenihan on July 5, 2012. (kcc)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: GLENN v. WYNDER et al | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
