JACKSON v. THE CITY OF PITTSBURGH et al
| CHARLES JACKSON |
| JAMES JOYCE, TERRY COLLINGS, THE CITY OF PITTSBURGH, TIMOTHY KREGER, ERIC HOLMES, MARK GOOB and THE COUNTY OF ALLEGHENY, PENNSYLVANIA |
| 2:2007cv00111 |
| January 30, 2007 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania |
| Pittsburgh Office |
| Allegheny |
| Thomas M. Hardiman |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| Both |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
264
MEMORANDUM ORDER indicating that upon consideration of Plaintiff Charles Jackson's Motion for Relief of Judgment and New Trial Pursuant to FRCP Rule 60(b)(3) and 60(b)(6) (Docket No. 263 ), Rule 60(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and precedent interpreting same, it is hereby ordered that, for reasons stated more fully within, that Plaintiff's motion 263 is denied. Signed by Judge Nora Barry Fischer on 9/8/11. (jg)
|
|
Filing
260
MEMORANDUM OPINION indicating that, for reasons stated within, Plaintiff's motion for a new trial and his motion for reconsideration (Docket Nos. 214 , 218 ), are denied. Likewise, to the extent Plaintiff seeks relief from judgment under Rule 60, the same is also denied. An appropriate Order follows.Signed by Judge Nora Barry Fischer on 8/8/11. (jg)
|
|
Filing
229
MEMORANDUM ORDER denying, without prejudice, Plaintiff's Pro Se 219 "Motion to Purchase All Transcripts In Forma Pauperis;" (details more fully stated in said Order). Signed by Judge Nora Barry Fischer on 11/24/10. (jg)
|
|
Filing
198
MEMORANDUM OPINION re: 126 Defendants' Joint Motion in Limine No. 2: Exclusion of Baranowski's "Expert" Testimony and Report; said Motion 126 is granted, in part and, denied, in part (details more fully stated within). An appropriate Order follows. Signed by Judge Nora Barry Fischer on 8/13/10. (jg)
|
|
Filing
166
MEMORANDUM ORDER indicating that Defendants' Joint Motion in Limine No.3 Exclusion of Jackson's Claim for Vehicle Damages 128 is granted (details more fully stated in said Order). Signed by Judge Nora Barry Fischer on 6/17/2010. (bdk).
|
|
Filing
98
MEMORANDUM OPINION indicating that, for the reasons stated more fully within, re: Defendant's Joint Motion for Summary Judgment 80 , the Court finds that Defendants are entitled to summary judgment on Plaintiffs claims under the Eighth Amendmen t, 42 U.S.C. §§ 1983, 1985, and 1986, and on his Pennsylvania state law claims, as contained in Counts II, IV, V, and VI of his Fourth Amended Complaint (Docket No. 56 ); therefore, these claims are dismissed. Defendants Joint Motion for Summary Judgment is denied as to Plaintiff's Fourth Amendment claims for unlawful arrest, search and use of excessive force in Counts I and III. An appropriate Order follows. Signed by Judge Nora Barry Fischer on 2/22/10. (jg)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
