HARRIS et al v. KELLOGG BROWN & ROOT SERVICES, INC.
| CHERYL A. HARRIS and DOUGLAS MASETH |
| KELLOGG BROWN & ROOT SERVICES, INC. |
| 2:2008cv00563 |
| April 22, 2008 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania |
| Pittsburgh Office |
| Butler |
| Nora Barry Fischer |
| P.I.: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Notice of Removal-Personal Injury |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
466
ORDER indicating that upon consideration of the Motion to Strike Report of Neutral filed by mediator David B. White, Esquire 465 , it is hereby ordered that said Motion 465 is granted, in part, and denied, in part. Said Motion is granted to the extent that the Report of Neutral filed by Mr. White on 12/30/16 will be stricken from the record. However, said Motion is denied insofar as Mr. White asks that the Court strike the standard Administrative Closeout Order entered in this matter, aside from the reference to his being a "court-appointed neutral," which is stricken from the Order (details more fully stated in said Order). Signed by Judge Nora Barry Fischer on 1/5/17. (jg)
|
|
Filing
457
MEMORANDUM ORDER indicating that upon consideration of 395 DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS BASED ON YEARSLEY QUALIFIED IMMUNITY filed by KELLOGG BROWN & ROOT SERVICES, INC.; its Brief in Support, (Docket No. 396 ), Plaintiffs' Brief in Opp osition, (Docket No. 430 ), KBR's Reply, (Docket No. 437 ), and Plaintiffs' Sur-Reply, (Docket No. 441 ); KBR's Motion to Dismiss 395 is DENIED (details more fully stated in said Memorandum Order). Signed by Judge Nora Barry Fischer on 9/9/2016. (bdk)
|
|
Filing
389
MEMORANDUM OPINION indicating that, fore reasons more fully stated in said Opinion, Defendant's Motion for Certification and Amendment of Order Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1292(b) 352 is denied; An appropriate Order follows. Signed by Judge Nora Barry Fischer on 4/27/16. (jg)
|
|
Filing
342
MEMORANDUM OPINION indicating that, for reasons more fully stated within, KBRs Motion for Application of the Texas Proportional Liability Scheme 319 is denied. The Pennsylvania laws of joint and several liability that were in effect as of 1/2/08 and do not permit the assessment of fault to non-parties by the jury will be applied to the apportionment and liability issues in this case. An appropriate Order follows. Signed by Judge Nora Barry Fischer on 12/16/15. (jg)
|
|
Filing
306
MEMORANDUM OPINION (details more fully stated within); An Appropriate Order follows. Signed by Judge Nora Barry Fischer on 7/13/12. (jg)
|
|
Filing
248
MEMORANDUM OPINION indicating that, for reasons stated within, KBR's motion for reconsideration 241 is denied. The Courts prior ruling that Iraqi law will not be applied to this litigation stands. An appropriate Order follows. Signed by Judge Nora Barry Fischer on 9/23/11. (jg)
|
|
Filing
235
MEMORANDUM OPINION indicating that KBR's Motion to Apply Iraqi Law 215 is DENIED (details more fully stated in said Memorandum Opinion. Signed by Judge Nora Barry Fischer on 6/17/2011. (bdk)
|
|
Filing
195
MEMORANDUM ORDER indicating that Defendant Kellogg, Brown and Root Services, Inc.'s Motion for Entry of Case Management Order 186 for reasons more fully stated in said order; parties shall file an amended Rule 26(f) Report by November 16, 2010; A second case management conference shall be held on November 23, 2010 at 10:00 a.m. Signed by Judge Nora Barry Fischer on 11/5/2010. (bdk) Modified on 11/5/2010 to correct typo. (bdk)
|
|
Filing
153
MEMORANDUM OPINION indicating that, based on the reasons more fully stated in said Opinion, Defendant KELLOGG BROWN & ROOT SERVICES, INC.'s Motion to Dismiss 18 is DENIED. Signed by Judge Nora Barry Fischer on 3/31/2009. (bk)
|
|
Filing
117
MEMORANDUM OPINION indicating that, for the reasons stated more fully herein, Plaintiffs Motion for Sanctions 98 is denied. An appropriate Order to follow. Signed by Judge Nora Barry Fischer on 3/11/09. (jg)
|
|
Filing
90
MEMORANDUM ORDER indicating that, based on the reasons more fully stated in said Order, Plaintiffs Motion to Include a Sharing Provision in the Courts Confidentiality Order 83 is denied. The Court will not include Plaintiffs proposed paragraphs 2( k), 2(l) and 3 in the proposed Confidentiality and Protective Order. However, Defendants proposed paragraph 2(k) shall be adopted and incorporated into the Courts Confidentiality and Protective Order. The Confidentiality and Protective Order encompassing the Courts ruling follows. Signed by Judge Nora Barry Fischer on 12/15/08. (jg)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
