CUMMINGS v. REPOSKY et al
| WILLIAM BRANDON CUMMINGS |
| G. K. REPOSKY, THOMAS RICHTER and KUTCHER |
| 2:2009cv00070 |
| February 2, 2009 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania |
| Prisoner Civil Rights (Prison Condition) Office |
| Fayette |
| Alan N. Bloch |
| None |
| Federal Question |
| 42:1983pr Prisoner Civil Rights |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
97
ORDER adopting 94 Report and Recommendations as the opinion of the court, as supplemented in the memorandum opinion; denying 90 Motion for Relief of Judgment; denying 95 Objections. Signed by Judge Joy Flowers Conti on 3/1/2024. (lyk)
|
|
Filing
56
ORDER denying 54 Motion to Appoint Counsel; denying 54 Motion to Compel; denying without prejudice 54 Motion to Communicate with Inmate Witnesses. Signed by Judge Cathy Bissoon on 1/06/2011. A copy of this Order was mailed to Plaintiff's address of record. (dad)
|
|
Filing
39
ORDER adopting Report and Recommendations re 37 Report and Recommendations dated November 18, 2009 as the opinion of the court.; granting 26 partial Motion to Dismiss. Signed by Judge Joy Flowers Conti on 12/17/09. (smc )
|
|
Filing
37
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION that Defendants' Partial Motion to Dismiss 26 be granted. Objections to R&R due by 12/2/2009. Signed by Judge Cathy Bissoon on 11/18/09. (mlw)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
