STEHLE-ROSELLINI v. ALLSTATE CORPORATION
Plaintiff: SALLY ANN STEHLE-ROSELLINI
Defendant: ALLSTATE CORPORATION
Case Number: 2:2009cv00895
Filed: July 8, 2009
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania
Office: Pittsburgh Office
County: Butler
Presiding Judge: Lisa Pupo Lenihan
Nature of Suit: Plaintiff
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
January 25, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 17 OPINION re 8 MOTION to Remand filed by SALLY ANN STEHLE-ROSELLINI. Signed by Judge Lisa Pupo Lenihan on 01/25/2010. (jmb)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Pennsylvania Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: STEHLE-ROSELLINI v. ALLSTATE CORPORATION
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: SALLY ANN STEHLE-ROSELLINI
Represented By: Kurt S. Rishor
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: ALLSTATE CORPORATION
Represented By: Krista Kochosky Orashan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?