SUBER v. KERESTES et al
Petitioner: RONALD LEE SUBER
Respondent: JOHN KERESTES, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF ALLEGHENY and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Case Number: 2:2009cv01049
Filed: August 10, 2009
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania
Office: Pittsburgh Office
County: Schuylkill
Presiding Judge: Amy Reynolds Hay
Nature of Suit: None
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
December 21, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 29 ORDER re 26 Motion for Miscellaneous Relief filed by RONALD LEE SUBER is hereby DENIED because Petitioner fails to establish the extraordinary circumstances required so as to justify relief under Fed.R.Civ.P. 60(b). Signed by Magistrate Judge Maureen P. Kelly on 12/21/2012. A copy of this order is being sent to Petitioner at his address of record along with a copy of this docket entry. (tmr)
September 10, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 25 ORDER denying 21 Rule 60(b) Motion for Relief from Final Judgment. The Motion ostensibly filed pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 60(b) is really a second or successive Section 2254 Habeas Petition and must be denied for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. In the alterantive, to the extent it is proprely treated as a Rule 60(b) motion, it is denied because it fails to establish the extraordinary circumstances as required by Rule 60(b) in order to justify relief. Signed by Magistrate Judge Maureen P. Kelly on 9-10-2012. A copy of the order is being mailed to Petitioner at his address of record. (tmr)
February 10, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 15 MEMORANDUM ORDER AND OPINION re 3 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by RONALD LEE SUBER, denying petition for writ of habeas corpus and denying certificate of appealability. Signed by Judge Cathy Bissoon on 2/10/2011. (tmr)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Pennsylvania Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: SUBER v. KERESTES et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: RONALD LEE SUBER
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: JOHN KERESTES
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF ALLEGHENY
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?