HUDAK v. BOBITSKI et al
| JOSEPH E. HUDAK |
| REGIS W. BOBITSKI and LISA A. BOBITSKI |
| 2:2009cv01172 |
| August 29, 2009 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania |
| Pittsburgh Office |
| Allegheny |
| Donetta W. Ambrose |
| Plaintiff |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Other Contract |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
45
ORDER denying 35 Motion for Summary Judgment. Signed by Judge Donetta W. Ambrose on 06/13/2011.(sps)
|
|
Filing
29
ORDER denying 20 Motion for Summary Judgment. AND NOW, this 28th day of December, 2010, after careful consideration of the submissions of the parties and for the reasons set forth in the Opinion accompanying this Order, it is ordered that Plaintif f's Second Supplemental Motion for Summary Judgment (Docket No. 20 ) is denied. A Pretrial/Settlement conference is scheduled for January 24, 2010, 2011 at 11:30 a.m. before the undersigned in Courtroom 3B of the U.S. Post Office & Courthouse, 700 Grant Street, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. Counsel, if any, shall have settlement authority, and parties are to be either present or available by telephone.Signed by Judge Donetta W. Ambrose on 12/28/10. (slh)
|
|
Filing
7
ORDER denying 6 Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction. Signed by Judge Donetta W. Ambrose on 1/8/10. (ask)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
