BROMFIELD et al v. ENTERPRISE RENT-A-CAR COMPANY et al
| JASMINE BROMFIELD and NILS HAGSTROM |
| ENTERPRISE RENT-A-CAR COMPANY, ENTERPRISE LEASING COMPANY SOUTH CENTRAL, INC, XYZ Corporations 1-5 and ELRAC, INC. |
| 2:2009cv01188 |
| September 1, 2009 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania |
| Pittsburgh Office |
| XX US, Outside State |
| Joy Flowers Conti |
| None |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 201 Fair Labor Standards Act |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
201
MEMORANDUM OPINION re 90 MOTION for Summary Judgment as to Plaintiff Nils Hagstrom. For the reasons set forth in this memorandum opinion, the court will deny the motion for summary judgment with respect to sample plaintiff Nils Hagstrom (ECF No. 90 ). A separate order will follow. Signed by Judge Joy Flowers Conti on 09/13/2012. (dmm)
|
|
Filing
199
MEMORANDUM OPINION re 87 MOTION for Summary Judgment as to Plaintiff Joseph Biski. For the reasons set forth in this memorandum opinion, the court will deny the motion for summary judgment with repsect to sample plaintiff Joseph Biski (ECF No. 87 ). A separate order will follow. Signed by Judge Joy Flowers Conti on 8/22/2012. (tcg)
|
|
Filing
84
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER re 34 MOTION to Certify Class. IT IS ORDERED that plaintiffs' motion for conditional certification IS GRANTED as set forth more fully in the memorandum opinion and order. Signed by Judge Joy Flowers Conti on 8/13/2010. (bjk)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
