KEYBANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION v. VOYAGER GROUP, LP et al
KEYBANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION |
VOYAGER GROUP, LP and VOYAGER INVESTMENTS LP |
2:2009cv01238 |
September 11, 2009 |
US District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania |
Pittsburgh Office |
Allegheny |
Donetta W. Ambrose |
None |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 36 OPINION AND ORDER OF COURT: AND NOW, this 7th day of April, 2010, it is Ordered that KeyBank's Motion to Dismiss Amended Counterclaims (Docket No. 28 ) is DENIED as to all Counts. Signed by Judge Donetta W. Ambrose on 4/7/2010. (jlh ) |
Filing 25 OPINION AND ORDER OF COURT: It is Ordered that KeyBank's Motion to Dismiss Counterclaims (Docket No. 16 ) is DENIED as to Counts I, II, and V and the negligent misrepresentation claim of Count III and GRANTED without prejudice as to the fraudul ent misrepresentation claim of Count III and Count IV. The Voyager Entities may file Amended Counterclaims curing the deficiencies, as noted in the above opinion, in their counterclaims for fraudulent misrepresentation and constructive fraud by February 18, 2010. Signed by Judge Donetta W. Ambrose on 2/4/2010. (jlh ) |
Filing 24 OPINION AND ORDER OF COURT: AND NOW, this 22nd day of December, 2009, it is Ordered that Defendants' Motion for Transfer to Montana Pursuant to § 1404(a) (Docket No. 10 ) is DENIED. Signed by Judge Donetta W. Ambrose on 12/22/09. (jlh ) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.