CRANBERRY PROMENADE, INC. et al v. CRANBERRY TOWNSHIP et al
| CRANBERRY PROMENADE, INC., NAP ASSOCIATES, INC., NAP ASSOCIATES 2, INC. and THOMAS W. PETRARCA |
| CRANBERRY TOWNSHIP, RICHARD HADLEY, JOHN SKORUPAN, JOHN W. MILIUS, DAVE ROOT, BRUCE MAZZONI, RON HENSHAW and JOHN K. TRANT, JR. |
| 2:2009cv01242 |
| September 11, 2009 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania |
| Pittsburgh Office |
| Butler |
| Nora Barry Fischer |
| Plaintiff |
| 18 U.S.C. ยง 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
97
MEMORANDUM OPINION indicating that Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment 69 is granted as to Plaintiffs' § 1983 and civil RICO claims and the Court declines to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over the remaining state law civil conspiracy claim.(details more fully stated in said Memorandum Opinion). Signed by Judge Nora Barry Fischer on 12/29/2011. (bdk)
|
|
Filing
28
MEMORANDUM ORDER indicating that, for the reasons stated more fully within, Defendants' motion to dismiss 14 is granted in part and denied in part. It is granted to the extent that Plaintiffs' RICO and civil conspiracy claims against Cranberry Township are dismissed, with prejudice. It is denied in all other respects. Plaintiffs are entitled to discovery of their remaining claims. Case Management Order follows. Signed by Judge Nora Barry Fischer on 2/22/10. (jg)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
