RHOADES v. YOUNG WOMEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF GREATER PITTSBURGH et al
| BEATRIZ RHOADES |
| YOUNG WOMEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF GREATER PITTSBURGH, VALERIE H. WHEATLEY, BARBARA JEAN MANNING, LILLIAN BEE YOUNG and DENA N. DAVIS |
| 2:2009cv01548 |
| November 23, 2009 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania |
| Pittsburgh Office |
| Allegheny |
| Donetta W. Ambrose |
| Plaintiff |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 621 Job Discrimination (Age) |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
49
ORDER granting 46 Defendants' Motion to Dismiss action pursuant to Rule 41(b).Signed by Judge Donetta W. Ambrose on 7/6/11. (laf)
|
|
Filing
43
ORDER denying as moot 35 Motion to Stay; granting 40 Motion ; granting 40 Motion to Stay. Having carefully considered Plaintiff's motion to certify opinion and order for interlocutory appeal and motion for stay of proceedings [Docket Nos. 40, 41], Defendants' response thereto [Docket No. 42], and Defendants' motion to stay action pending appeal [Docket No. 35], it is hereby ORDERED that Plaintiff's motion is GRANTED. Defendants' motion is DENIED as moot.Signed by Judge Donetta W. Ambrose on 1/24/11. (laf)
|
|
Filing
25
Opinion and Order of the Court granting 10 Motion to Dismiss. Plaintiff may file an amended complaint on or before November 24, 2010. Signed by Judge Donetta W. Ambrose on 11/9/2010. (jlh )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
