GAUS v. NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY

Justia Dockets & Filings Third Circuit Pennsylvania Western District GAUS v. NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY

GAUS v. NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY

Plaintiff:	ANTHONY GAUS
Defendant:	NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY
Case Number:	2:2009cv01698
Filed:	December 28, 2009
Court:	US District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania
Office:	Pittsburgh Office
County:	Lawrence
Presiding Judge:	Lisa Pupo Lenihan
Nature of Suit:	Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Employment
Cause of Action:	29 U.S.C. § 0794 Job Discrimination (Handicap)
Jury Demanded By:	Plaintiff

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
September 28, 2011	Filing 43 MEMORANDUM OPINION granting in part and denying in part 23 Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment. As set forth more fully within, the court finds that material issues of fact do not exist with respect to the conduct or events occurring prio r to January 1, 2009, therefore, the court will GRANT defendant's motion for summary judgment as to that portion of plaintiff's claim. The court, however, finds that material issues of fact exist about the events occurring on or after Janu ary 1, 2009, thereby precluding summary judgment for conduct or events thereafter. Defendant's motion for summary judgment is DENIED with respect to that portion of plaintiff's claim. Signed by Judge Joy Flowers Conti on 9/28/2011. (cal )

Date Filed

Document Text

September 28, 2011

Filing 43 MEMORANDUM OPINION granting in part and denying in part 23 Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment. As set forth more fully within, the court finds that material issues of fact do not exist with respect to the conduct or events occurring prio r to January 1, 2009, therefore, the court will GRANT defendant's motion for summary judgment as to that portion of plaintiff's claim. The court, however, finds that material issues of fact exist about the events occurring on or after Janu ary 1, 2009, thereby precluding summary judgment for conduct or events thereafter. Defendant's motion for summary judgment is DENIED with respect to that portion of plaintiff's claim. Signed by Judge Joy Flowers Conti on 9/28/2011. (cal )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Pennsylvania Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: GAUS v. NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: ANTHONY GAUS
Represented By:	Gregory G. Paul
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?