KIRSCHNER et al v. WACHOVIA CAPITAL MARKETS, LLC et al
MARC S. KIRSCHNER, COMPASS FINANCIAL CORPORATION and MB FINANCIAL BANK, N.A. |
WACHOVIA CAPITAL MARKETS, LLC, WACHOVIA BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, CIT GROUP/EQUIPMENT FINANCING, INC., KRONES, INC., KRONES AG, VOLKER KRONSEDER, HEINZ SOMMER, MARSHALL FINANCIAL, INC., MARSHALL INVESTMENTS CORPORATION, THE POLLINGER COMPANY, INC., DONALD K. POLLINGER, PAUL POLLINGER, GREGORY J. PODLUCKY, JONATHAN E. PODLUCKY, DAVID E. GETZIK, ROBERT B. LYNN, ANDREW MURIN, JR., COMPASS BANK, THE MARSHALL GROUP, MARSHALL BANKFIRST CORP., WILEY H. SHARP, III, BDO SEIDMAN, LLP and KRONES AKTIENGESELLSCHAFT |
2:2009mc00162 |
May 15, 2009 |
US District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania |
Pittsburgh Office |
Donetta W. Ambrose |
Other |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 596 ORDER granting 573 Motion to Dismiss; denying as moot 590 Motion for Summary Judgment. Signed by Judge Donetta W. Ambrose on 5/10/13. (ask) |
Filing 532 ORDER denying 483 Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings; denying 487 Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings; granting in part and denying in part 488 Sealed Motion; denying 490 Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings; granting in part and denying in part 491 Sealed Motion. Signed by Judge Donetta W. Ambrose on 2/2/12. (ask, ) |
Filing 523 ORDER granting 437 Motion to Dismiss. Signed by Judge Donetta W. Ambrose on 11/21/11. (laf) |
Filing 519 ORDER denying as moot 434 Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings; denying as moot 466 Motion to Amend/Correct; denying as moot 467 Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings. Signed by Judge Donetta W. Ambrose on 10/27/11. (cha) |
Filing 458 ORDER denying 418 Motion to Dismiss. Signed by Judge Donetta W. Ambrose on 5/26/11. (ask) |
Filing 333 ORDER denying 255 Motion to Dismiss. Signed by Judge Donetta W. Ambrose on 5/6/10. (ask) |
Filing 301 ORDER granting 246 Motion to Dismiss. Signed by Judge Donetta W. Ambrose on 4/16/10. (slh) |
Filing 169 ORDER denying 132 Wachovia Capital Markets, LLC d/b/aWachovia Securities' and Wachovia Bank, National Association's Motion for Reconsideration; denying 134 Krones AG's, Krones Inc.'s, Heinz Sommer's, and Dr. Volker Kronse der's Motion for Reconsideration; denying 135 CIT Group/Equipment Financing, Inc.'s Motion for Reconsideration; terminating CIT Group/Equipment Financing, Inc.'s Motion for Joinder. Signed by Judge Donetta W. Ambrose on October 23, 2009. (lmt) |
Filing 126 ORDER granting in part and denying in part 65 Motion to Dismiss. AND now, this 16th day of September, 2009, upon consideration of the Motion to Dismiss filed by Defendants, Wachovia Capital Markets, LLC d/b/a Wachovia Securities and Wachovia Bank, National Association (Docket No. 65), it is ordered that said Motion is granted in part and denied in part. Count Ten (against Wachovia for Breach of Fiduciary Duty) is dismissed, with prejudice. The motion is denied in all other respects. Signed by Judge Donetta W. Ambrose on 09/16/2009. (sps) |
Filing 98 ORDER granting 32 Motion to Remand. The action filed at civil action number 9-431 shall be remanded to the Superior Court of Arizona, Maricopa County, Arizona. The action filed at civil action number 9-431 shall be marked CLOSED. Signed by Judge Donetta W. Ambrose on 7/21/09. (slh) |
Filing 91 ORDER granting in part and denying in part 14 Motion to Compel arbitration. Signed by Judge Donetta W. Ambrose on 7/16/09. (ask) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.