LASKO v. EMERALD COAL RESOURCES et al
MICHAEL ALBERT LASKO |
EMERALD COAL RESOURCES, CUMBERLAND MINE SERVICE, INC, FOUNDATION COAL CORPORATION, HEINTZMANN TECH CORPORATION, HEINTZMANN CORP and PRECISION STAFFING SERVICE, INC |
2:2010cv00117 |
January 26, 2010 |
US District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania |
Pittsburgh Office |
Greene |
Terrence F. McVerry |
Civil Rights: Other |
29 U.S.C. ยง 621 Job Discrimination (Age) |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 53 MEMORANDUM OPINION and ORDER granting 36 Motion to Dismiss filed by Defendant Precision Staffing Services, Inc.; granting 38 Motion to Dismiss filed by Defendants Emerald Coal Resources, Cumberland Mine Service, Inc., and Foundation Coal Corporat ion; and granting 40 Motion to Dismiss filed by Heintzmann Corporation. It is further ordered that Plaintiff's Amended Complaint is dismissed in its entirety and with prejudice. The Clerk shall docket this case closed. Signed by Judge Terrence F. McVerry on 9/24/2010.(cdb) |
Filing 34 MEMORANDUM OPINION and ORDER granting 20 EMERALD'S, CUMBERLAND'S AND FOUNDATION'S MOTION TO DISMISS; and granting 26 HEINTZMANN CORPORATION'S MOTION TO DISMISS. It is further ORDERED that, on or before May 18, 2010, Plaintiff may file an amended complaint to correct the noted deficiencies in his original complaint, or file a notice of intent to stand on the current complaint. Signed by Judge Terrence F. McVerry on 5/4/2010. (cdb) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.