TENNIS et al v. FORD MOTOR COMPANY
| RICHARD A. TENNIS, RONDA L. TENNIS, TENNIS, INC. and TENNIS ROOFING & ASPHALT, INC. |
| FORD MOTOR COMPANY |
| 2:2010cv00563 |
| May 4, 2010 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania |
| Pittsburgh Office |
| Allegheny |
| Terrence F McVerry |
| Prop. Damage Prod. Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Property Damage |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 9, 2010. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
RECEIPT from Eastern District of Michigan for Case opened in their District received on 12/9/2010. Case Opened on 11/15/2010 with case number as 10-14594. (jv)
|
|
Filing 21
Certified Copy of Conditional Transfer Order received from Eastern District of Michigan. (jv)
|
|
Case electronically transferred to Eastern District of Michigan. (jv)
|
|
Filing 20
REPORT of Mediation: Case has been resolved. DONALD E. ZIEGLER terminated. Attorney Donald E. Ziegler terminated. The parties are reminded of their obligation to complete the ADR questionnaire and return same to the Clerk of Court within 5 days of the conclusion of the ADR process. The questionnaire can be accessed at www.pawd.uscourts.gov. Click on the ADR icon. Mediation session was held on 11/15/2010. (map)
|
|
Filing 19
Conditional Transfer Order received from the Judicial Panel on Multi-District Litigation. (jv)
|
|
Filing 18
ORDER denying #15 Motion to Stay. Signed by Judge Terrence F. McVerry on 10/8/2010. (kly)
|
|
CLERK'S OFFICE QUALITY CONTROL MESSAGE re #17 Response to Motion. ERROR: Proposed Order was made part of main document. CORRECTION: Attorney advised that in future proposed orders are to be made attachments to the main document. This message is for informational purposes only. (ept)
|
|
Filing 17
RESPONSE to Motion re #15 MOTION to Stay ALL PROCEEDINGS PENDING TRANSFER TO MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION PROCEEDING filed by RICHARD A. TENNIS, RONDA L. TENNIS, TENNIS ROOFING & ASPHALT, INC., TENNIS, INC.. (Morrow, Clayton)
|
|
TEXT ORDER Response/Briefing Schedule re #15 Motion to Stay and #16 Brief in Support of Motion. Response to Motion due by 10/7/2010. Signed by Judge Terrence F. McVerry on 10/1/2010. Text-only entry; no PDF document will issue. This text-only entry constitutes the Order of the Court or Notice on the matter. (kly)
|
|
Filing 16
BRIEF in Support re #15 Motion to Stay ALL PROCEEDINGS PENDING TRANSFER TO MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION PROCEEDING filed by FORD MOTOR COMPANY. (Barnett, Lisa)
|
|
Filing 15
MOTION to Stay ALL PROCEEDINGS PENDING TRANSFER TO MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION PROCEEDING by FORD MOTOR COMPANY. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Proposed Order) (Barnett, Lisa)
|
|
TEXT ORDER of COURT: The Court has reviewed #15 Defendant's Motion For Stay of All Proceedings Pending Transfer to Multidistrict Litigation Proceeding. Plaintiff intends to respond on or before October 7, 2010. The Case Management Conference scheduled on Friday, October 1, 2010 at 8:30 AM is continued generally. Text only entry; no PDF document will issue. This text only entry constitutes the Court's order or notice in the matter. Signed by Judge Terrence F. McVerry on 9/30/2010. (kly)
|
|
Filing 14
NOTICE OF FILING OF MDL NOTICE OF RELATED ACTION by FORD MOTOR COMPANY (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A) (Barnett, Lisa)
|
|
Filing 13
STIPULATION selecting ADR process by FORD MOTOR COMPANY (Barnett, Lisa)
|
|
Filing 12
REPORT of Rule 26(f) Planning Meeting. (Barnett, Lisa)
|
|
Filing 11
INITIAL LOCAL RULE 16.1 SCHEDULING CONFERENCE: Case Management Conference set for 10/1/2010 at 09:15 AM in Courtroom 6C before Terrence F. McVerry. Rule 26 Meeting to be conducted on or before 8/30/2010. Rule 26 Meeting Report due by 9/20/2010. Signed by Judge Terrence F. McVerry on 8/9/2010. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Stipulation Selecting ADR Process, #2 Exhibit Rule 26(f) Report) (kly)
|
|
Filing 10
ANSWER to Complaint with Affirmative Defenses by FORD MOTOR COMPANY. (Barnett, Lisa)
|
|
Filing 9
NOTICE of Appearance by Anthony J. Rash on behalf of FORD MOTOR COMPANY. (Rash, Anthony)
|
|
Filing 8
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER granting in part and denying in part #4 Motion to Dismiss -- granting motion to dismiss Counts IV, V, VI, VIII and IX, and denying in all other respects ; denying #4 Motion to Strike. Defendant shall file an Answer as to Counts I, II, III and VII of the Complaint on or before August 6, 2010. Signed by Judge Terrence F. McVerry on 7/26/10. (mh, )
|
|
Update Answer Deadline: Answer due from FORD MOTOR COMPANY on or before 8/6/2010 (mh, )
|
|
CLERK'S OFFICE QUALITY CONTROL MESSAGE re #4 Motion to Dismiss, Motion to Strike. ERROR: MULTIPLE Relief Motion Filed as One Relief. CORRECTION: Attorney advised in future that Motions of this nature are to be filed using the Motion Event and clicking on all the reliefs sought in said motion. Clerk of Court added Motion to Strike to existing #4 Motion to Dismiss. This message is for informational purposes only. (jv)
|
|
Filing 7
BRIEF in Support of #6 Response to Motion to Defendants Motion to Dismiss and Motion to Strike filed by RICHARD A. TENNIS, RONDA L. TENNIS, TENNIS ROOFING & ASPHALT, INC., TENNIS, INC.. (Morrow, Clayton)
|
|
Filing 6
RESPONSE to Motion re #4 MOTION to Dismiss Pursuant to Rule 12 (b)(6) filed by RICHARD A. TENNIS, RONDA L. TENNIS, TENNIS ROOFING & ASPHALT, INC., TENNIS, INC.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Morrow, Clayton)
|
|
TEXT ORDER Response/Briefing Schedule re #4 Motion to Dismiss and #5 Brief in Support of Motion. Response to Motion due by 6/1/2010. Signed by Judge Terrence F. McVerry on 5/12/2010. Text-only entry; no PDF document will issue. This text-only entry constitutes the Order of the Court or Notice on the matter. (kly)
|
|
Filing 5
BRIEF in Support re #4 Motion to Dismiss filed by FORD MOTOR COMPANY. (Barnett, Lisa)
|
|
Filing 4
MOTION to Dismiss Pursuant to Rule 12 (b)(6) by FORD MOTOR COMPANY. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Barnett, Lisa). Added MOTION to Strike on 6/1/2010 (jv).
|
|
Filing 3
Disclosure Statement identifying Ford Motor Credit Company; Ford Holdings, Inc.; Ford Leasing Corporation (formerly known as USL Capital Corporation); Ford Capital BV; Ford Motor Company Capital Trust II, China-Jiangling Motors Corporation, Limited, Japan-Mazda Motor Corporation and Turkey-Ford Otomotiv Sanayi Anonim Sirketi (Otosan) as corporate parent or other affiliate, by FORD MOTOR COMPANY. (Barnett, Lisa)
|
|
Filing 2
NOTICE that instant civil action has been designated for placement into the United States District Court's Alternative Dispute Resolution program. Parties are directed to fully complete the required 26(f) report, which includes the stipulation of selecting an ADR process. Counsel for plaintiff (or in the case of a removal action, counsel for removing defendant) shall make service of the notice on all parties. (kly)
|
|
Filing 1
NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Court of Common Pleas of Allegheny County, case number GD 09-023706 (Filing fee $350, receipt number 0315-1593666), filed by FORD MOTOR COMPANY. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit - Various State Court Pleadings including Complaint) (jv)
|
|
CLERK'S OFFICE QUALITY CONTROL MESSAGE re #1 Notice of Removal. ERROR: Party did not file disclosure statement as required pursuant L.R. 7.1.1. CORRECTION: Attorney advised to file statement within 7 days. This message is for informational purposes only. Disclosure Statement due by 5/11/2010. (jv)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
