NICHOLSON v. ASTRUE
Plaintiff: MARK ALLEN NICHOLSON
Defendant: MICHAEL J. ASTRUE
Case Number: 2:2010cv00725
Filed: May 25, 2010
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania
Office: Pittsburgh Office
County: Fayette
Presiding Judge: Gary L. Lancaster
Nature of Suit: Supplemental Security Income
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1383
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
December 9, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 23 ORDER granting 22 Motion to Alter or Amend Judgment on Plaintiff's Petition for Equal Access to Justice Act Fees; Plaintiff is awarded $4,346.88 in attorney's fees under the EAJA, 28 U.S.C. § 2412(a); Pursuant to this Order, th e Commissioner will confer with the Department of Treasury to determine whether Plaintiff has any qualifying outstanding federal debt subject to be offset from the attorney fees; If Plaintiff has no outstanding federal debt, the Commissioner will hon or Plaintiffs assignment of attorney fees to counsel and make the check payable to Plaintiffs counsel; However, if Plaintiff has an outstanding federal debt, the Commissioner will make the check payable to Plaintiff and deliver the check to the busin ess address of Plaintiffs counsel; If Plaintiff has an outstanding federal debt, the amount of any attorney fees payable to Plaintiff will be the balance of $4,346.88 after offsetting the amount of Plaintiffs outstanding federal debt; If Plaintiff's outstanding federal debt exceeds $4,346.88, the EAJA award will be used to offset Plaintiff's federal debt, and no attorney fees shall be paid. Signed by Chief Judge Gary L. Lancaster on 12/9/11. (map)
November 18, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 21 ORDER granting 17 Motion for Attorney Fees in the amount of $4,346.88. Signed by Chief Judge Gary L. Lancaster on 11/18/11. (map)
July 22, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 15 MEMORANDUM OPINION and ORDER denying 11 Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment and denying in part and granting in part 9 Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment; Plaintiff's motion is DENIED to the extent that it requests a judic ially-ordered award of benefits but GRANTED to the extent that it seeks a vacation of the final decision of the Commissioner of Social Security, and a remand for further administrative proceedings; The decision of the Commissioner of Social Security is hereby VACATED, and this case is remanded for further proceedings consistent with this opinion. Signed by Chief Judge Gary L. Lancaster on 7/22/11. (map)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Pennsylvania Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: NICHOLSON v. ASTRUE
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: MARK ALLEN NICHOLSON
Represented By: Gregory T. Kunkel
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: MICHAEL J. ASTRUE
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?