PALMER v. NASSAN et al
Plaintiff: DAVID PALMER
Defendant: SAMUEL NASSAN, THE PENNSYLVANIA STATE POLICE, TERRENCE DONNELLY, SHEILA LADNER and CITY OF PITTSBURGH
Case Number: 2:2010cv00922
Filed: July 12, 2010
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania
Office: Pittsburgh Office
County: Allegheny
Presiding Judge: Arthur J. Schwab
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
February 10, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 81 ORDER denying 79 Plaintiff's Motion for Reconsideration of His Motion in Limine to Attack the Credibility of Defendant Nassan Under F.R.E. 613(a) and (b). Signed by Judge Arthur J. Schwab on 2/10/2011. (lmt)
February 9, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 78 ORDER granting in part and denying in part 68 Plaintiff's Motion in Limine. Signed by Judge Arthur J. Schwab on 2/9/2011. (lmt)
January 26, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 62 ORDER granting in part and denying in part 52 Defendant's Motion in Limine. Signed by Judge Arthur J. Schwab on 1/26/2011. (lmt)
January 20, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 59 ORDER denying 55 Motion to Bifurcate. Signed by Judge Arthur J. Schwab on 1/20/2011. (lmt)
August 20, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 12 ORDER granting in part and denying in part 3 Defendants' Partial Motion to Dismiss. Defendants Partial Motion to Dismiss is granted with respect to plaintiffs Eighth Amendment claims. Defendants Partial Motion to Dismiss is also granted in par t as to: (1) plaintiffs battery claim asserted against Defendant Nassan, and (2) plaintiffs §1983 claims asserted against defendant Pennsylvania State Police, but plaintiff is given leave to correct the deficiencies in these respects. Defendant s Partial Motion to Dismiss is denied in all other respects. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiff file an Amended Complaint on or before August 30, 2010 addressing those matters noted above. Defendant may file a responsive pleading to the Amended Complaint on or before September 8, 2010. If Defendant files a renewed Motion to Dismiss, plaintiffs response to same shall be due on or before September 14, 2010. Signed by Judge Arthur J. Schwab on 8/20/2010. (lmt)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Pennsylvania Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: PALMER v. NASSAN et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: DAVID PALMER
Represented By: David K. Houck
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: SAMUEL NASSAN
Represented By: Michael E. Kennedy
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: THE PENNSYLVANIA STATE POLICE
Represented By: Michael E. Kennedy
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: TERRENCE DONNELLY
Represented By: Michael E. Kennedy
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: SHEILA LADNER
Represented By: Michael E. Kennedy
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: CITY OF PITTSBURGH
Represented By: Michael E. Kennedy
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?