ANDERSON v. FOLINO et al
| KEITH ANDERSON |
| LOUIS FOLINO, VICTOR SANTOYA, BOWMAN, GRIMM, RICK SHAFFER, RAUENSWINDER, BOGDEN, NELSON, STUMP, RUSH, DUKE, KERFELT, MICHELLE GIBBS, JOHN MCANANY, WILSON, WALTER, DONNA DOE, ROXANNA DOE, MEGA and TANNER |
| 2:2010cv00937 |
| July 15, 2010 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania |
| Pittsburgh Office |
| Centre |
| Cathy Bissoon |
| Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
107
MEMORANDUM ORDER granting 103 Motion for Extension of Time to File Objections and confirming 101 MEMORANDUM ORDER, granting 88 Motion for Summary Judgment and 91 Motion for Summary Judgment and adopting 100 Report and Recommendation as th e opinion of the Court, and 102 ORDER entering FINAL JUDGMENT; 105 Motion to Alter or Amend Judgment is denied; Pursuant to Rule 4(a)(1) of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure, plaintiff has thirty (30) days to file a notice of appeal as provided by Rule 3 of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure. Signed by Chief Judge Gary L. Lancaster on 3/11/13. (map)
|
|
Filing
101
MEMORANDUM ORDER granting 88 Motion for Summary Judgment and 91 Motion for Summary Judgment, and adopting 100 Report and Recommendation as the opinion of the Court; Clerk of Court to mark this case closed; Plaintiff advised of appellate rights. Signed by Chief Judge Gary L. Lancaster on 2/15/13. (map)
|
|
Filing
86
MEMORANDUM AND OPINION re Order denying motions for default judgment. Signed by Magistrate Judge Cynthia Reed Eddy on 06/13/2012. (far)
|
|
Filing
61
ORDER construing 60 Objection to the Courts Denial of Plaintiff's Motion to Compel Discovery filed by KEITH ANDERSON as an appeal of 56 Order on Motion to Compel and denying same; Instant case is referred back to assigned Magistrate Judge for further proceedings. Signed by Chief Judge Gary L. Lancaster on 11/9/11. (map)
|
|
Filing
55
MEMORANDUM ORDER granting in part and denying in part 36 Motion to Dismiss; granting in part and denying in part 42 Motion to Dismiss; Plaintiff's claims are disposed of in the following manner: 1. The following claims are DISMISSED with pre judice: (a) Plaintiffs claims against Defendants in their official capacities; (b) Plaintiff's claims against Defendant Bogden concerning alleged interference in the grievance process; (c) Plaintiff's claims regarding denial of a period of exercise, alleged threats made by Defendants, allegedly false misconduct charges, and allegedly mishandled institutional grievances; (d) Plaintiff's "custom and practice" claims; and (e) Plaintiff's state tort claims against all n on-medical professional Defendants; 2. The following claims are DISMISSED without prejudice to Plaintiff filing an amended complaint: (a) Plaintiff's Eighth Amendment denial of medical care claims; (b) Plaintiff's failure to intervene claim s with respect to all Defendants except Defendant Rauenswinder; and (c) Plaintiff's remaining conspiracy claims against all Defendants except Defendant Rauenswinder; Plaintiff shall, if appropriate, file an amended complaint with respect to thes e claims within 21 days of the date of this order; Failure to do so will result in the dismissal of these claims with prejudice; 3. Plaintiff's claims arising from the Pennsylvania Constitution are DISMISSED for lack of subject matter jurisdicti on, without prejudice to Plaintiff re-filing in state court; 4. Defendants' motions to dismiss are DENIED with respect to: (a) Plaintiff's failure to intervene claim against Defendant Rauenswinder; (b) Plaintiff's conspiracy claim agai nst Defendant Rauenswinder; and (c) Plaintiff's state law tort claims against Defendants Gibbs, McAnany, Wilson, Walter, Donna Doe, and Roxanna Doe; 54 Report and Recommendation is adopted as the opinion of this Court. Signed by Chief Judge Gary L. Lancaster on 9/19/11. (map)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
