DOE v. ALLEGHENY COUNTY et al
| JANE DOE |
| RAMON C. RUSTIN, JOHN JOHNSON, JR., ALLEGHENY COUNTY and ALLEGHENY CORRECTIONAL HEALTH SERVICES, INC. |
| 2:2010cv01761 |
| December 30, 2010 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania |
| Pittsburgh Office |
| Allegheny |
| Lisa Pupo Lenihan |
| Prisoner Civil Rights (Prison Condition) |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Both |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
173
MEMORANDUM OPINION AWARDING DAMAGES TO PLAINTIFF AGAINST DEFENDANT JOHN JOHNSON, JR. Signed by Chief Magistrate Judge Lisa Pupo Lenihan on 08/28/2014. (jmb)
|
|
Filing
160
MEMORANDUM AND OPINION: Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment against Johnson at ECF No. 89 will be granted in its entirety. Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment against ACHS at ECF No. 93 will be denied, and ACHS' Motion for Su mmary Judgment at ECF No. 138 will be granted as to Plaintiff's § 1983 claim, and denied without prejudice as to Plaintiff's professional negligence claim. Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment against Rustin at ECF No. 97 will be denied. Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment against the County at ECF No. 101 will be denied. Finally, the Motion for Summary Judgment filed by the County and Rustin at ECF No. 125 will be granted as to Rustin, and denied as it relates to the County. An appropriate order will follow. Signed by Magistrate Judge Lisa Pupo Lenihan on 3/27/2013. (vad)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
