MARINO v. ZONE 4 POLICE OFFICER SHAWN P. GORMAN et al
| VINCE MARINO |
| ZONE 4 PITTSBURGH POLICE, CITY OF PITTSBURGH, HOWARD D. MCQUILLAN, WILLIAM WHITE and OFFICER SHAWN P. GORMAN |
| 2:2011cv00906 |
| July 7, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania |
| Pittsburgh Office |
| Allegheny |
| Arthur J. Schwab |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
72
ORDER denying 64 Motion for Contempt; granting 64 Motion to Compel Responses to Interrogatories, for the reasons set forth in the attached document. Signed by Judge Cathy Bissoon on 2/23/2012. (rtt)
|
|
Filing
61
ORDER granting in part and denying in part 43 Motion to Dismiss, as set forth in the attached document. Count II (Negligence) of Plaintiff's Second Amended Complaint 41 is dismissed with prejudice, to the extent that it differs from the "negligence" claim asserted in Plaintiff's first Amended Complaint 3 . Defendant's Motion to Dismiss is denied in all other respects. Signed by Judge Cathy Bissoon on 1/23/2012. (rtt)
|
|
Filing
27
MEMORANDUM AND OPINION re 20 Disqualification Affidavit filed by VINCE MARINO. Signed by Judge Arthur J. Schwab on 9-12-11. (nam)
|
|
Filing
10
MEMORANDUM ORDER denying 4 Motion to Remand to State Court (and for Costs). Signed by Judge Arthur J. Schwab on 8-9-11. (nam)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
