BERRY v. CHURCHILL BOROUGH et al
LORI BERRY |
DANIEL STEPHANS, WAYNE ANDERSON, THE COUNTY OF ALLEGHENY, JANICE BATES-MATUSAK, DYNASTY SECURITY, INC., JOHN DOE, CHURCHILL BOROUGH, ALLEN L. PARK, STEPHEN SHAULIS, ROCH J. KUJAVA and WOODLAND HILLS SCHOOL DISTRICT |
2:2011cv01343 |
October 24, 2011 |
US District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania |
Pittsburgh Office |
Allegheny |
Joy Flowers Conti |
Other Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 122 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER. As set forth in the accompanying memorandum opinion and order, it is HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiffs' motion for leave to file a third amended complaint with respect to defendants Daniel Stephens and Woodland Hills S chool District (ECF No. 103 ) is DENIED. It is FURTHER ORDERED that the motion to dismiss with respect to the Fourteenth Amendment substantive due process claims against defendants Daniel Stephens and the Woodland Hills School District (ECF No. [108 ]) is DENIED as moot. It is FURTHER ORDERED that the motion to dismiss filed by defendant Daniel Stephens with respect to the claim of malicious prosecution filed against him in count three (ECF No. 108 ) is GRANTED. It is FURTHER ORDERED that the motion to dismiss filed by defendant Stephen Shaulis with respect to the claim of malicious prosecution filed against him in count three (ECF No. 112 ) is GRANTED. Signed by Judge Joy Flowers Conti on 7/19/2013. (dmm) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.