TRASK et al v. OLIN CORPORATION
WAYNE TRASK, BETH TRASK and ALLYSSA TRASK |
OLIN CORPORATION |
2:2012cv00340 |
March 20, 2012 |
US District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania |
Pittsburgh Office |
Armstrong |
Nora Barry Fischer |
Personal Injury- Product Liability |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
Defendant |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 236 MEMORANDUM OPINION indicating that, for reasons more fully stated within, Plaintiffs Motion for Leave to Amend 166 will be granted. An appropriate order follows. Signed by Judge Nora Barry Fischer on 3/31/16. (jg) |
Filing 234 MEMORANDUM OPINION indicating that, for reasons stated more fully within, Defendant's Motions 178 180 seeking to preclude the expert testimony of Michael Knox and Charles Powell are Ddenied. An appropriate Order follows. Signed by Judge Nora Barry Fischer on 3/28/16. (jg) |
Filing 199 ORDER indicating that upon consideration of Plaintiffs' Motion for Reconsideration of the Court's Order Scheduling Daubert Hearings 193 and Defendant Olin Corporation's Opposition to Plaintiffs' Motion for Reconsideration 198 , the Court denies Plaintiffs' Motion for reasons more fully stated in said Order. Signed by Judge Nora Barry Fischer on 10/8/15. (jg) |
Filing 110 MEMORANDUM OPINION indicating that, for reasons stated within, Defendant's Motion for Reconsideration 80 is denied; An appropriate Order follows. Signed by Judge Nora Barry Fischer on 3/4/14. (jg) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.