STERN v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiff: THEODORE & ELIZABETH STERN
Defendant: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Case Number: 2:2012cv00906
Filed: June 29, 2012
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania
Office: Pittsburgh Office
County: Allegheny
Presiding Judge: Terrence F McVerry
Referring Judge: Robert C Mitchell
Nature of Suit: Taxes
Cause of Action: 26 U.S.C. ยง 6702
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on October 2, 2012. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 2, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 11 ORDER granting #10 Stipulation of Dismissal filed by UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and THEODORE & ELIZABETH STERN. Signed by Judge Terrence F. McVerry on 10/1/2012. (kly)
October 1, 2012 Filing 10 STIPULATION of Dismissal by THEODORE & ELIZABETH STERN, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA. (Belen, Christopher)
October 1, 2012 Filing 9 STATUS REPORT by THEODORE & ELIZABETH STERN. (Potter, Charles)
August 1, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER FOR STATISTICAL CLOSING. Signed by Judge Terrence F. McVerry on 8/1/2012. (kly)
August 1, 2012 Filing 7 Minute Entry for proceedings held before Magistrate Judge Robert C. Mitchell: Case Management Conference held on 8/1/2012. (Court Reporter: none) (spc)
July 26, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER REASSIGNING CASE: Instant case, related to Civil Action No. 11-1016, is reassigned for all further proceedings to the docket of District Judge Terrence F. McVerry and referred to Magistrate Judge Robert C. Mitchell. Signed by Chief Judge Gary L. Lancaster on 7/26/12. (map)
July 19, 2012 Filing 5 SUMMONS/Return of Service Returned Executed by THEODORE & ELIZABETH STERN. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA served on 7/9/2012, answer due 9/7/2012. (plh)
July 19, 2012 Filing 4 SUMMONS/Return of Service Returned Executed by THEODORE & ELIZABETH STERN. All Defendants. (Potter, Charles) Modified on 7/20/2012. (plh) This document removed from public view and redocketed at Doc. #5 .
July 2, 2012 Filing 3 NOTICE that instant civil action has been designated for placement into the United States District Court's Alternative Dispute Resolution program. Parties are directed to fully complete the required 26(f) report, which includes the stipulation of selecting an ADR process. Counsel for plaintiff (or in the case of a removal action, counsel for removing defendant) shall make service of the notice on all parties. (map)
July 2, 2012 Summons Issued as to *UNITED STATES OF AMERICA* (plh)
June 29, 2012 Filing 2 Disclosure Statement identifying none as corporate parent or other affiliate, by THEODORE & ELIZABETH STERN. (plh)
June 29, 2012 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against UNITED STATES OF AMERICA (Filing fee $350, receipt number 2421503), filed by THEODORE & ELIZABETH STERN. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons) (plh)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Pennsylvania Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: STERN v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: THEODORE & ELIZABETH STERN
Represented By: Charles L. Potter, Jr.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?