WOSOTOWSKY v. METLIFE INSURANCE CO, INC et al
| JOHN D. WOSOTOWSKY |
| METLIFE SECURITIES, INC. and METLIFE INSURANCE CO, INC |
| 2:2012cv01805 |
| December 10, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania |
| Pittsburgh Office |
| XX US, Outside State |
| Maureen P. Kelly |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
20
MEMORANDUM OPINION re: 10 Plaintiff's motions for reconsideration, recusal, and change of venue. Signed by Chief Judge Joy Flowers Conti on 11/1/2013. (blr)
|
|
Filing
9
ORDER adopting 4 Report and Recommendations. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Complaint is dismissed pursuant to the Prison Litigation Reform Act for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Re port and Recommendation, ECF No. 4 , filed on March 11, 2013, by Magistrate Judge Kelly, is adopted as the opinion of the court, except to the extent that the Report relied upon Plaintiffs failure to allege properly the citizenship of all the partie s because Plaintiff showed he could cure this defect in his objections. The Clerk is to mark the case closed. Any further amendment of the Complaint would be futile. Lastly, the Court certifies pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(a) that any appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith. Signed by Judge Joy Flowers Conti on 4/19/2013. (smc )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
