BROOKVILLE EQUIPMENT CORPORATION v. A.L. LEE CORPORATION

Plaintiff: BROOKVILLE EQUIPMENT CORPORATION
Defendant: A.L. LEE CORPORATION
Case Number: 2:2013cv00059
Filed: January 11, 2013
Court: Pennsylvania Western District Court
Office: Pittsburgh Office
County: Jefferson
Presiding Judge: Arthur J. Schwab
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35:145 Patent Infringement
Jury Demanded By: Both

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
March 22, 2013 17 Opinion or Order of the Court MEMORANDUM ORDER DENYING 8 Defendant's Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Request for a Finding of Willful Infringement. Signed by Judge Arthur J. Schwab on 3/22/2013. (lcb)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Pennsylvania Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: BROOKVILLE EQUIPMENT CORPORATION v. A.L. LEE CORPORATION
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: BROOKVILLE EQUIPMENT CORPORATION
Represented By: Anthony W. Brooks
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: A.L. LEE CORPORATION
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets were retrieved from PACER, and should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.