SPENCER v. CRYSTAL WATERS, INC. et al
| NORMA JEAN SPENCER |
| CRYSTAL WATERS, INC., THOMAS H. LOUGHRY, JOHN W. LOUGHRY, TLHCOAL, CO. and JONATHAN D. CLARK |
| 2:2013cv00334 |
| March 7, 2013 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania |
| Pittsburgh Office |
| XX US, Outside State |
| David S. Cercone |
| Torts to Land |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
78
MEMORANUDUM ORDER granting in part and denying in part 68 defendants' partial motion to dismiss plaintiff's second amended complaint. The motion is granted as to the breach of fiduciary claim at Count V. The motion is denied in all othe r aspects without prejudice to raise - after the close of discovery - any advanced factual or legal basis for relief in a motion for summary judgment. All as more fully set forth in the Memorandum Order. Signed by Judge David S. Cercone on 9/28/15. (mwm)
|
|
Filing
62
MEMORANDUM ORDER denying 37 Defendant's Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint. The portion of the motion seeking dismissal for failure to join an indispensable party under Rule 19 is denied with prejudice; all other aspects of the motion are denied without prejudice to raise - after the close of discovery - any advanced factual or legal basis for relief in a motion for summary judgment. Signed by Judge David S. Cercone on 9/8/14. (kak)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
