LAUREN v. PNC BANK, N.A. et al
| XI CHEN LAUREN |
| AMERICAN SECURITY INSURANCE COMPANY, ASSURANT, INC. and PNC BANK, N.A. |
| 2:2013cv00762 |
| June 4, 2013 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania |
| Pittsburgh Office |
| Allegheny |
| Terrence F. McVerry |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Other Contract |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
82
ORDER TRANSFERRING CASE to the United States District Court for the Southern District of Ohio (Eastern Division) FORTHWITH as explained therein. Signed by Judge Terrence F. McVerry on 2/25/14. (mh, )
|
|
Filing
60
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER granting 53 Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction as explained therein. Signed by Judge Terrence F. McVerry on 1/14/14. (mh, )
|
|
Filing
55
MEMORANDUM ORDER denying 42 Motion for Reconsideration as explained therein. Signed by Judge Terrence F. McVerry on 11/21/13. (mh, )
|
|
Filing
41
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER granting 16 Motion to Dismiss by Assurant;granting in part and denying in part 18 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim by ASIC; granting in part and denying in part 26 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim by PNC; and denying as moot 40 Motion to Stay Discovery, as explained therein. Defendants ASIC and PNC to file Answers to remaining claims on or before October 22, 2013. Signed by Judge Terrence F. McVerry on 10/8/13. (mh, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
