SANCHEZ v. COLEMAN et al
| JOSE SANCHEZ |
| COLEMAN, HERBIK, BERRIER, K. RANDOLPH, HOUSE and VARNER |
| 2:2013cv00982 |
| July 11, 2013 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania |
| Pittsburgh Office |
| Fayette |
| Cynthia Reed Eddy |
| Prisoner Civil Rights (Prison Condition) |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
118
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER denying 93 Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment; denying 99 Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment; granting 107 Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment. Signed by Magistrate Judge Cynthia Reed Eddy on 11/30/2015. (bsc)
|
|
Filing
80
ORDER granting 39 Defendant Herbik's Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim; granting 65 the Commonweawlth Defendants' Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim to the extent that Plaintiff's claims of deliberate indif ference to his medical needs are dismissed. Plaintiff's claims for failure to protect against Defendant House, K. Randolph, Coleman, and Varner are the sole remaining claims in this lawsuit. Signed by Magistrate Judge Cynthia Reed Eddy on 12/11/2014. (bsc)
|
|
Filing
35
ORDER denying 25 Motion for TRO; denying 25 Motion for Preliminary Injunction. Signed by Magistrate Judge Cynthia Reed Eddy on 10/23/2013. (bsc)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
