BLOOM v. CONGREGATION BETH SHALOM
||CONGREGATION BETH SHALOM
||October 4, 2013
||Pennsylvania Western District Court
||Maurice B. Cohill
|Nature of Suit:
|Cause of Action:
|Jury Demanded By:
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|Date Filed||#||Document Text|
|January 31, 2014
OPINION & ORDER re 8 MOTION to Strike or, in the alternative MOTION to dismiss filed by CONGREGATION BETH SHALOM indicating that the motion is granted in part and denied in part. Defendant's motion to strike is GRANTED as to paragraph 12 and paragraphs 14-33. Paragraph 12 and paragraphs 14-33 are hereby stricken from Plaintiff's Amended Complaint; Defendant's motion to strike is DENIED as to the remaining challenged paragraphs; Defendant's motion to dismiss is DENIED as moot as Court finds that Plaintiff has not asserted claims of sexual harassment or hostile work environment. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of Courts is hereby DIRECTED to place UNDER SEAL the initial Complaint and Amended Complaint, which are contained as Exhibit A (ECF No. 1-1) to Defendant's Notice of Removal (ECF No. 1). IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff shall file a Second Amended Complaint in accord with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 8(a)(2) and the Opinion accompanying this Order by 2/14/2014; Defendant's response due by 2/28/2014.Signed by Judge Maurice B. Cohill on 1/31/2014. (rtw)
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets were retrieved from PACER, and should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.