FORTA CORPORATION v. SURFACE-TECH, LLC et al
Plaintiff: FORTA CORPORATION
Defendant: SURFACE-TECH, LLC, JAS COMPANY, LLC and JOE STURTEVANT
Case Number: 2:2013cv01608
Filed: November 7, 2013
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania
Office: Pittsburgh Office
County: Mercer
Presiding Judge: Nora Barry Fischer
Nature of Suit: Trademark
Cause of Action: 15 U.S.C. ยง 1051
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
June 11, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 111 MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER indicating that, for reaons stated more fully within, that the Defendants' objections are overruled; that Plaintiff's Motion to Adopt in part and modify in part the Special Master's 4/1/15 Report and Recomme ndation 106 , is granted, in part, and denied, in part; that Special Master McIlvaine's R&R on Claim Construction is adopted, in part, as outlined in said Order. An appropriate Claim Construction Order follows. Signed by Judge Nora Barry Fischer on 6/11/15. (jg)
March 5, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 97 MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER indicating that the Court having participated in the Markman Hearing in this action, and upon consideration of the Defendants' Motion to Strike Certain Portions of Plaintiff's Expert Testimony and Hearing Exhibits Presented at the 11/11/14 Claim Construction Hearing 89 , Defendants' Brief in Support of same 90 , Plaintiff's Brief in Opposition 91 , Defendants' Reply Brief 93 , the Special Master's Report and Recommendation 94 , Defe ndants' Objections thereto 95 , and Plaintiff's Responsive Brief 96 , it is hereby ordered that Defendants' Objections are overruled; that, upon de novo review, the Special Master's Report and Recommendation is adopted as the o pinion of the Court, with the exception that Defendants shall have fourteen days to submit a supplemental expert report, rather than the recommended ten; that Defendants' Motion is granted, only to the extent Defendants seek to file a supplemental expert report directly rebutting the testimony and exhibits addressed above and is denied in all other respects; that said supplemental report shall be filed by 3/19/15. Signed by Judge Nora Barry Fischer on 3/5/15. (jg)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Pennsylvania Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: FORTA CORPORATION v. SURFACE-TECH, LLC et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: FORTA CORPORATION
Represented By: Wendy West Feinstein
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: SURFACE-TECH, LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: JAS COMPANY, LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: JOE STURTEVANT
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?