ROSEWOOD CANCER CARE, INC. et al v. THE TRAVELERS INDEMNITY COMPANY OF AMERICA
ROSEWOOD CANCER CARE, INC. and JEFFERSON RADIATION ONCOLOGY CENTER, L.P. |
THE TRAVELERS INDEMNITY COMPANY OF AMERICA |
2:2014cv00434 |
April 3, 2014 |
US District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania |
Pittsburgh Office |
Allegheny |
Joy Flowers Conti |
Insurance |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2201 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 148 OPINION re 127 MOTION to Strike 121 Appendix,,, filed by JEFFERSON RADIATION ONCOLOGY CENTER, L.P., ROSEWOOD CANCER CARE, INC., 113 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by JEFFERSON RADIATION ONCOLOGY CENTER, L.P. , ROSEWOOD CANCER CARE, INC., 118 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by THE TRAVELERS INDEMNITY COMPANY. As set forth more fully within Plaintiffs' motion for partial summary judgment will be granted. Defendant's cross-moti on for summary judgment will be denied with respect to Counts One and Two of the complaint. Defendant's motion will be denied with respect to Count Three insofar as plaintiffs' bad faith claim is premised on Travelers' failure to prov ide a written explanation of its coverage decision relative to the Linac; in all other respects, defendant's motion for summary judgment will be granted as it relates to Count Three of the complaint. Finally, plaintiffs' motion to strike the affidavit of Chaz Beadling will be denied. Signed by Chief Judge Joy Flowers Conti on 09/28/16. (vrk) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.