JE CORCORAN COMPANY v. REED SAUL, INC. et al
| JE CORCORAN COMPANY |
| REED SAUL, INC. and DAVID GOLOMB |
| 2:2014cv01044 |
| August 6, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania |
| Pittsburgh Office |
| Allegheny |
| Nora Barry Fischer |
| Agricultural Acts |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1391 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
74
MEMORANDUM OPINION indicating that, for reasons more fully stated within, the Defendant David Golomb's motion for judgment on the pleadings is granted as to Count 4 of the Amended Complaint and denied in all other respects. An appropriate order follows. Signed by Judge Nora Barry Fischer on 6/21/16. (jg)
|
|
Filing
27
MEMORANDUM OPINION indicating that, based upon the stated within, as a legitimate assignee of full title to any PACA claim against Defendants that JE Corcoran may have, Coface has standing to bring the present PACA claim. However, the wording of th e Assignment even when viewed in the light most favorable to JE Corcoran as the non-moving party demonstrates that JE Corcoran fully and voluntarily relinquished its rights to bring a PACA claim against Defendants. Accordingly, Defendants' Motion to Disallow 21 Coface Insurance to File a PACA Claim is denied, and Defendants' Motion to Dismiss 22 JE Corcoran as a Plaintiff is granted. Appropriate Order follows. Signed by Judge Nora Barry Fischer on 5/7/15. (jg)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
