HUMPHREY v. WETZEL et al
| DOUGLAS E. HUMPHREY |
| JOHN E. WETZEL, BRIAN COLEMAN, VINCENT MAZESKI, TREMPUS, SKOBOL and PEBINGTON |
| 2:2014cv01349 |
| October 6, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania |
| Pittsburgh Office |
| XX US, Outside State |
| Maureen P. Kelly |
| Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
48
MEMORANDUM ORDER granting defendants' 30 Motion to Dismiss and adopting the 46 Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Kelly as the opinion of the Court. The Clerk shall mark this case CLOSED. Signed by Judge David S. Cercone on 8/13/15. (njt)
|
|
Filing
17
ORDER denying 15 Motion for Service by U.S. Marshal of the subpoena directed to a non-party, albeit without prejudice to refiling only after a dispositive motion or an Answer has been filed and the issues better clarified. Signed by Magistrate Judge Maureen P. Kelly on 11/12/2014. A copy of the Order together with this Notice of Electronic Filing are being sent to Plaintiff at his address of record via first class mail. (tmr)
|
|
Filing
9
MEMORANDUM (Order to follow as separate docket entry)Since the Western Distict of Pennsylvania is a more convenient forum, this matter will be transferred to the United States District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 1404 (a).Signed by Honorable Richard P. Conaboy on 10/6/14. (cc)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
