WHITE v. WETZEL
Plaintiff: JOHN U. WHITE
Defendant: JOHN E. WETZEL
Case Number: 2:2014cv01552
Filed: November 13, 2014
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania
Office: Pittsburgh Office
County: Mercer
Presiding Judge: Cynthia Reed Eddy
Nature of Suit: Prison Condition
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
June 9, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 56 MEMORANDUM OPINION re 41 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM filed by JOHN MCDONALD, LINDA FOUST, JOHN E. WETZEL, MICHAEL MAHLMEISTER, DEBRA SAUERS, LINDA PETERSON, MORRIS, SALES, ROBIN LEWIS, WENDY ROUDA, DENISE BUNNER, DANIEL BURNS, BRIAN THOMPSON. Signed by Magistrate Judge Cynthia Reed Eddy on 6/9/2016. (bap)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Pennsylvania Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: WHITE v. WETZEL
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: JOHN U. WHITE
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: JOHN E. WETZEL
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?