WILSON v. GILMORE et al
| JAMAR WILSON |
| ROBERT GILMORE, JOHN DOE #1, JOHN DOE #2, JOHN DOE #3, JOHN DOE #4, JOHN DOE #5, JOHN DOE #6 and JANE DOE |
| 2:2014cv01654 |
| December 8, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania |
| Pittsburgh Office |
| Greene |
| Lisa Pupo Lenihan |
| Prisoner Civil Rights (Prison Condition) |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Defendant |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
80
MEMORANDUM OPINION on the 63 Partial MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by ROBERT GILMORE, POKOL, JAMES GILLIS, STEPHEN DURCO, JOSHUA BARNHART. Summary judgment will be granted in favor of Durco, Gilmore, and Does Nos. 4, 5, and 6. Signed by Magistrate Judge Lisa Pupo Lenihan on 09/30/2016. (jmb)
|
|
Filing
22
ORDER directing Counsel for Defendant Gilmore to identify the seven John and Jane Doe Defendants as set forth herein. Signed by Magistrate Judge Lisa Pupo Lenihan on July 15, 2015. (kcc)
|
|
Filing
20
ORDER denying 11 Motion to Dismiss; adopting Report and Recommendations 19 as the Opinion of this Court. This Order was sent to Plaintiff at address of record via first class mail this date. Signed by Judge Arthur J. Schwab on 6-22-15. (nam)
|
|
Filing
17
MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER re 14 MOTION to Appoint Counsel filed by JAMAR WILSON. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff's 14 Motion for Appointment of Counsel is denied without prejudice. Signed by Magistrate Judge Lisa Pupo Lenihan on 5/5/15. (clh)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
