VILKOFSKY v. RUSHMORE LOAN SERVICING, LLC et al
| FRANCIS VILKOFSKY, JR |
| RUSHMORE LOAN SERVICING, LLC, SPECIALIZED LOAN SERVICING, LLC and U.S. BANK, N.A. |
| 2:2016cv01291 |
| August 24, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania |
| Pittsburgh Office |
| Allegheny |
| Nora Barry Fischer |
| Consumer Credit |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1692 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
181
MEMORANDUM OPINION indicating that, for reasons more fully stated within, Defendants' Motions for Summary Judgment ( 150 and 152 ) are granted. An appropriate order follows. Signed by Judge Nora Barry Fischer on 3/28/19. (jg)
|
|
Filing
139
MEMORANDUM OPINION (details more fully stated in said Order); An appropriate Order follows. Signed by Judge Nora Barry Fischer on 6/12/18. (jg)
|
|
Filing
80
MEMORANDUM OPINION indicating that, for reasons stated within, the Court finds that: (1) Plaintiff has adequately pled RESPA claims against Rushmore and SLS at Counts I and III of the Second Amended Complaint, but that said claims are dismissed to th e extent that an accounting is sought as an equitable remedy; (2) Plaintiff cannot state a claim against Rushmore or SLS under the FDCPA at Counts II and IV, and same shall be dismissed; and (3) Plaintiff has failed to state a claim against USB at Co unt V pursuant to respondeat superior, and same shall be dismissed. In light of Plaintiffs attempts to establish the above claims in three separate complaints (Docket Nos. 1 ; 13 ; 57 ), in this Court's estimation, further attempts to amend Counts I and III with respect to equitable relief via an accounting, as well as all claims in Counts II, IV, and V, would be unsuccessful. Accordingly, same shall be denied with prejudice. See Phillips, 515 F. 3d at 245 46 (dismissal with prejudice is appropriate when leave to amend would be futile). An appropriate order follows. Signed by Judge Nora Barry Fischer on 6/14/17. (jg)
|
|
Filing
53
MEMORANDUM OPINION indicating that, for the reasons stated within, Defendants' Motions to Dismiss ( 15 and 26 ) shall be granted, in part, and denied, in part. An appropriate Order follows. Signed by Judge Nora Barry Fischer on 3/3/17. (jg)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
