BOMAR v. PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
| ARTHUR BOMAR |
| PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, JOHN E. WETZEL, ROBERT D. GILMORE, BRAUNLICH, JOHN/JANE DOE'S (1-99), TODD RICHARD, DETECTIVE CHAD M. BRUCKNER, JOHN/JANE DOE'S, KEVIN R. STEELE and STEVEN T. O'NEILL |
| 2:2017cv01035 |
| August 8, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania |
| Pittsburgh Office |
| Greene |
| Lisa Pupo Lenihan |
| Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
195
ORDER granting 162 Motion for Summary Judgment; adopting 187 Report and Recommendation. Details more fully stated herein; an appropriate Judgment follows. Signed by Judge Nora Barry Fischer on 12/21/2022. (lyk)
|
|
Filing
150
MEMORANDUM OPINION denying 145 Objections to Report and Recommendation filed by ARTHUR BOMAR, adopting 142 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION and Granting in part and Denying in part 133 MOTION to Dismiss. The motion is denied as to the excessive force claim against Braunlich and the deliberate indifference claim against Tate, but granted as to all other claims. Hence, all of Plaintiffs claims except those against Braunlich and Tate are DISMISSED. this matter is referred back to U.S. Magistrate Judge Lisa Pupo Lenihan for any remaining pretrial proceedings. Details more fully stated in the opinion. Signed by Judge Nora Barry Fischer on 12/3/21. (cjo)
|
|
Filing
149
MEMORANDUM OPINION: The Motion to Dismiss 135 filed by Defendants Smyth, Ridings, and Austin is GRANTED. Plaintiffs claims against these defendants for denial of medical care/deliberate indifference are DISMISSED, with prejudice, due to Plaintiffs failure to exhaust his administrative remedies relating to these claims and the Court finds that amendment of these claims would be futile. The Court notes that it reserves its decision on the Corrections Defendants Motion to Dismiss, 133 , which is also the subject of the 8/19/21 Report and Recommendation 142 , until a later date. A separate Order of Court addressing that motion will be issued in due course. Details more fully stated in the order. Signed by Judge Nora Barry Fischer on 10/14/21. (cjo)
|
|
Filing
73
ORDER indicating that Magistrate Judge Lenihan's Report and Recommendation 72 is adopted as the opinion of this Court; that Defendants' Motion to Dismiss 66 is granted, in part, and denied, in part. Said Motion 66 is granted with respect to Defendants Gilmore and Wetzel and denied with respect to Defendant Braunlich; that all of Plaintiff's claims against Defendants Gilmore and Wetzel are dismissed with prejudice. Signed by Judge Nora Barry Fischer on 2/25/20. (jg)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
