SHARRATT v. MURTHA
| JUSTIN SHARRATT |
| JOHN MURTHA |
| 3:2008cv00229 |
| September 25, 2008 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania |
| Civil Rights: Other Office |
| Cambria |
| Kim R. Gibson |
| Plaintiff |
| Federal Question |
| 28:1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
38
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER OF COURT granting 14 Motion to Dismiss and it is Ordered that Counts I, II, III, IV, V, and VI are DISMISSED, and as more fully stated in said Memorandum Opinion and Order of Court. Signed by Judge Kim R. Gibson on 3/26/2010. (dlg)
|
|
Filing
37
ORDER denying 35 Motion for Reconsideration and no oral argument will be heard for any of the pending motions in this matter as the Court will resolve these matters on the motions and briefs submitted by the parties. Signed by Judge Kim R. Gibson on 7/16/2009. (dlg)
|
|
Filing
36
BRIEF in Opposition re 35 Motion for Reconsideration filed by JOHN MURTHA, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA. (Werner, Paul)
|
|
Filing
33
REPLY to Response to Motion re 30 Reply Brief filed by JUSTIN SHARRATT. (Geary, Noah)
|
|
Filing
32
ORDER granting 31 Motion for Leave of Court to Respond to Defendant's Reply Brief. Plaintiff's response is due by 7/3/2009. Signed by Judge Kim R. Gibson on 7/1/2009. (dlg)
|
|
Filing
31
MOTION for Leave to File a Response to Defendant's Reply Brief by JUSTIN SHARRATT. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order) (Geary, Noah)
|
| Filing 30 |
|
Filing
29
ORDER granting 18 Motion for Leave of Court to File Answer and Brief to Government's Motion to Dismiss Counts I-III of Plaintiff's Complaint Nunc Pro Tunc. Plaintiff's Answer and Brief in Opposition to the Defendant's Motion to Dismiss Counts I-III of Plaintiff's Complaint shall be filed by 6/26/2009. Signed by Judge Kim R. Gibson on 6/24/2009. (dlg)
|
|
Filing
28
|
| Filing 26 |
|
Filing
22
ORDER granting 20 Motion for Reconsideration and the Plaintiff's Answer and Brief in Opposition to the Defendant's Rule 12 Motion to Substitute the United States as a Party for the Defendant John Murtha is hereby due on or before 6/19/2009. Signed by Judge Kim R. Gibson on 6/8/2009. (dlg)
|
| Filing 20 |
|
Filing
16
ORDER granting 12 Motion to Substitute Party and Congressman John Murtha is dismissed as defendant for Plaintiff's Counts IV-VI, inclusive, with prejudice. The United States of America is substituted as defendant for these counts for all further proceedings in this case. It is further Ordered that the caption of this action be amended to reflect the addition of the United States as a defendant. Signed by Judge Kim R. Gibson on 6/3/2009. (dlg)
|
|
Filing
15
BRIEF in Support re 14 Motion to Dismiss filed by JOHN MURTHA. (Werner, Paul)
|
|
Filing
11
AMENDED COMPLAINT against JOHN MURTHA; JOHN MURTHA answer due 6/15/2009, filed by JUSTIN SHARRATT. (Geary, Noah) Modified on 4/20/2009. (cen)
|
|
Filing
10
Errata re 9 Notice of Appearance by JOHN MURTHA. Reason for Correction: Signature Requirement. (Werner, Paul)
|
|
Filing
9
NOTICE of Appearance by Paul E. Werner on behalf of JOHN MURTHA (Werner, Paul)
|
|
Filing
8
Summons Issued as to U.S. Attorney General. (cen)
|
|
Filing
7
Errata re 4 Praecipe to Reissue Summons by JUSTIN SHARRATT. Reason for Correction: attaching additional summons. (Geary, Noah)
|
|
Filing
6
Summons Reissued as to JOHN MURTHA and U.S. Attorney. (cen)
|
|
Filing
4
PRAECIPE to Reissue Summons by JUSTIN SHARRATT (Geary, Noah)
|
|
Filing
3
NOTICE that the instant civil action has been designated for placement into the United States District Court's Alternative Dispute Resolution program. Parties are directed to fully complete the required 26(f) report, which includes the stipulation of selecting an ADR process. Counsel for plaintiff (or in the case of a removal action, counsel for removing defendant) shall make service of the notice on all parties. (dlg)
|
|
Filing
2
Summons Issued as to JOHN MURTHA. (cen)
|
| Filing 99 |
| Filing 97 |
| Filing 94 |
| Filing 90 |
| Filing 89 |
| Filing 87 |
| Filing 84 |
| Filing 74 |
| Filing 70 |
| Filing 65 |
| Filing 64 |
| Filing 57 |
| Filing 56 |
| Filing 55 |
| Filing 53 |
| Filing 51 |
| Filing 50 |
| Filing 49 |
| Filing 47 |
| Filing 46 |
| Filing 45 |
| Filing 43 |
| Filing 41 |
| Filing 40 |
| Filing 39 |
| Filing 190 |
| Filing 188 |
| Filing 182 |
| Filing 167 |
| Filing 155 |
| Filing 145 |
| Filing 140 |
| Filing 130 |
| Filing 124 |
| Filing 123 |
| Filing 122 |
| Filing 112 |
| Filing 111 |
| Filing 110 |
| Filing 104 |
| Filing 103 |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: SHARRATT v. MURTHA | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: JUSTIN SHARRATT | |
| Represented By: | Noah Geary |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: JOHN MURTHA | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
