ALLEN v. MAZURKIEWICZ et al
| THOMAS RAY ALLEN |
| JOSEPH F. MAZURKIEWICZ, JR., ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA and DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF BLAIR |
| 3:2011cv00190 |
| August 26, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania |
| Johnstown Office |
| Blair |
| Kim R. Gibson |
| Keith A. Pesto |
| General |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
38
MEMORANDUM ORDER - IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Petitioner Thomas Ray Allen's Motion for Relief From Judgment Under Rule 60(b)(6) at ECF No. 33 is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for the reasons stated in the Report and Recommendation at ECF No. 34 an d those set forth above. The Report and Recommendation at ECF No. 34 is adopted as the opinion of the Court for its reasoning and conclusions. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that a certificate of appealability is DENIED relative to the Motion at ECF No. [33 ] for the reasons stated in the Report and Recommendation at ECF No. 34 and those outlined above. The denial of a certificate of appealability does not prevent Petitioner from appealing the order denying his Motion so long as he seeks, and obtains , a certificate of appealability from the Court of Appeals. See FED.R.APP.P. 22(b)(1),(2). IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Petitioner Thomas Ray Allen's Motion for Relief From Judgment Under Rule 60(b)(6) at ECF No. 36 is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE f or the reasons stated in the Report and Recommendation at ECF No. 37 and those set forth above. The Report and Recommendation at ECF No. 37 is adopted for its reasoning and conclusion regarding the appropriate disposition of Petitioner's Mot ion. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that a certificate of appealability is DENIED relative to the Motion at ECF No. 36 for the reasons stated in the Report and Recommendation at ECF No. 37 and those outlined above. The denial of a certificate of appealabi lity does not prevent Petitioner from appealing the order denying his Motion so long as he seeks, and obtains, a certificate of appealability from the Court of Appeals. See FED.R.APP.P. 22(b)(1),(2), and as more fully stated in said Memorandum Order. Signed by Judge Kim R. Gibson on 3/12/2024. (dlg)
|
|
Filing
32
MEMORANDUM ORDER - It is HEREBY ORDERED that Magistrate Judge Pesto's R&R at ECF No. 29 is adopted as the Opinion of the Court for its reasoning and conclusion. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Mr. Allen's filing at ECF No. 28 is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE, and as more fully stated in said Memorandum Order. Signed by Judge Kim R. Gibson on 5/11/2023. (dlg)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
