FLICK v. GIROUX et al
| JASON RAY FLICK |
| NANCY GIROUX and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA |
| 3:2015cv00080 |
| March 25, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania |
| Johnstown Office |
| Somerset |
| Kim R. Gibson |
| Lisa Pupo Lenihan |
| General |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
39
MEMORANDUM ORDER - it is hereby Ordered that the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (ECF No. 38 ) is adopted as the Opinion of the Court. It is further Ordered that the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (ECF No. 1 ) and Supplement thereto (ECF No. 8 ) is denied. It is further Ordered that a Certificate of Appealability is denied. It is further Ordered that the Clerk of Court mark this case Closed. And it is further Ordered that pursuant to Rule 4(a)(1) of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure, Petitioner has thirty (30) days to file a notice of appeal as provided by Rule 3 of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure, and as more fully stated in said Memorandum Order. Signed by Judge Kim R. Gibson on 3/16/2018. (dlg)
|
|
Filing
5
ORDER granting 4 Motion to Amend/Correct; denying 4 Motion to Appoint Counsel; denying 4 Motion for Hearing. Signed by Magistrate Judge Lisa Pupo Lenihan on March 26, 2015. (kcc)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
