Maldonado-Pagan v. Administracion de Correccion et al
| Mariano Maldonado-Pagan |
| Administracion de Correccion and Guillermo Somoza-Colombanes |
| 3:2010cv01488 |
| June 3, 2010 |
| US District Court for the District of Puerto Rico |
| San Juan Office |
| Bayamon |
| Jose A Fuste |
| Prisoner Petitions (Prison Condition) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
90
OPINION AND ORDER granted 85 Motion to Dismiss Habeas Corpus Petition. Motion terminated: 86 pro se Motion to Submit New Evidence. Signed by Judge Carmen C. Cerezo on 8/27/2018. (mld)
|
|
Filing
53
OPINION AND ORDER DISMISSING 1 28 U.S.C. Section 2254 Petition filed by Mariano Maldonado-Pagan. Pursuant to Rule 4 of the Rules Governing § 2254 Cases, summary dismissal is in order because it plainly appears from the record that Petitio ner is not entitled to § 2254 relief from this court. According to Rule 8 of the Rules Governing § 2254 Cases, an evidentiary hearing is only held if the petition is not dismissed. Judgment shall enter accordingly. Although Maldonado has no t yet requested a COA, we see no way in which a reasonable jurist could find our assessment of his constitutional claims debatable or wrong. Maldonado may request a COA directly from the First Circuit, pursuant to Rule of Appellate Procedure 22.Signed by Judge Jose A. Fuste on 8/11/2014.(CP)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Puerto Rico District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
